SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Ker) 446

M.RAMACHANDRAN, B.N.SRIKRISHNA
Agricultural Income Tax and Sales Tax Officer – Appellant
Versus
Tata Tea Ltd. , – Respondent


Judgment :-

B. N. Srikrishna, C. J.

This appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 18th December, 1992, quashing and setting aside a penalty order imposed on the respondent by Exts. P6 to P6(s).

The appellant is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. On 3rd July 1976, the appellant purchased tea estates of three companies known as Kannan Devan Hill Produce Co. Ltd., Anglo American Direct Tea Trading Co. Ltd., and Amalgamated Tea Estates Ltd. These three companies were registered in the United Kingdom and for the sake of brevity they are hereinafter referred to as "U. K. Companies".

2. The concerned officer of the Sales Tax Department issued three registration certificates which were valid from 1. 7.1957 until cancelled. The respondent has been issued with notices by the Agricultural Income Tax and Sales Tax Officer, Munnar for offences alleged to be under S.10(a) and 10(d) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") committed by the three U. K. Companies between 1967 and 1973, arising out of different orders passed against the said companies on different dates. The three U. K. Companies held registrations un



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top