SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Ker) 300

K.A.ABDUL GAFOOR
Woodys Hotels (P) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Judgment :-

K.A. Abdul Gafoor, J.

Admittedly there is a loan agreement between the petitioner and the second respondent a Company registered under the Companies Act. Of course it is a Government owned Company. The business of the second respondent includes granting of loans to hoteliers including the petitioner. It is in that regard Ext. PI agreement was entered into between the parties providing for repayment and the relationship interse until the repayment is fully effected. Therefore, the rights and obligations of the parties arise, concerning the loan transaction from out of Ext. PI agreement which provides for various situations. The loan has to be repaid completely by 2007 as per the revised schedule. But the petitioner sought for early settlement of the transaction. That was finally answered in Ext. P34 the impugned order herein that in terms of the agreement settlement of accounts in respect of the loan prior to the scheduled period shall result in prepayment premium and interest which the respondent has qualified as Rs. 37,45,892,57. This letter is dated 8.2.2000.

2. Clause 4.8. of Ext. PI provides that "' The borrower shall not prepay the outstanding principal amounts of th







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top