SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Ker) 521

K.THANKAPPAN, J.B.KOSHY
Velandy Parakandy Damodaran – Appellant
Versus
Puthiya Kottal Safiya Beebi Umma – Respondent


Judgment :-

J.B. Koshy, J.

CRP.Nos.1786, 1888 and 1930/2002 are filed by the respondents in RCP. No.12/95 on the file of the Rent Control Court, Tellicherry. CRP.No.2866/2001 is filed by the landlord who was the petitioner in the above Rent Control Petition.

2. The landlord filed a petition for eviction under section 11(3), 11(4) (i) and 11(4) (iii) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") According to the landlord, the petition schedule building belongs to her and it was leased out to the first respondent in the Rent Control Petition as per registered kychit on a monthly rent of Rs.175/- on 13.9.1963. Respondents 2 and 3 in the R.C.P. are the sub tenants and first respondent sub leased portions of the building to them with the consent of then landlord. Without consent of the landlord first respondent sub leased a portion of the building to 4th respondent. It was also alleged that respondents 1 to 3 are not doing any business in the plaint schedule building. The rent was subsequently enhanced to Rs.275/-. It is averred that petitioner’s son Muhammed Ali is not having any avocation. He wants to start hotel business in the plaint




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top