SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Ker) 755

K.PADMANABHAN NAIR
Razack Trading Company – Appellant
Versus
J. K. Industries Ltd. – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The plaintiff in a suit for realisation of Rs. 20,35,8497- is the petitioner. The plaintiff filed the suit on 17.10.2002 after paying one tenth of the court fee. The learned Additional Sub Judge before whom the suit was filed ordered summons to the defendant as provided under 0.5 R.9(1) of Code of Civil Procedure. On the next day the batta for issuing summons ordered under 0.5 R.9(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure was paid and the suit was posted for return of notice on 16.11.2002. On 16.11.2002 the learned Additional Subordinate Judge was on leave. The case was called before the court of the Principle Sub Judge. According to the petitioner then only his Advocate came to know that in addition to the service of summons ordered under 0.5 R.9(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure the learned Sub Judge had also ordered to issue summons to the defendants by registered post with acknowledgment due as provided under R.9(3) of 0.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure also and directed the plaintiff to pay batta within three days. The steps for issuing notice by Registered post with acknowledgment due was not taken within three days as ordered by the court. Since the plaintiff did not



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top