SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Ker) 751

K.A.ABDUL GAFOOR, PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
National Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Gouri – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The insurer has come up with this appeal contending that, in terms of the admitted insurance policy, the liability is limited. In spite of that, the tribunal has awarded the amount as if the policy did not have any such limitation clause.

2. It is true that the policy in question was one issued under S.95 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, covering a period from 10.11.1988 to 9.11.1989. During the currency of the policy, that Act was repealed and a new Act, the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 was enforced with effect from 1.7.1989. From that day onwards, in terms of S.147 of that Act, the policy cannot have any limitation as was there in terms of S.95 of 1939 Act. If the new Section is applied, the insurer will not get the benefit.

3. The accident occurred on 10.9.1999, after enforcement of the new Act. The proviso to S.147(2) reads as follows:

"Provided that any policy of insurance issued with any limited liability and in force, immediately before the commencement of this Act, shall continue "to be effective" for a period of four months after such commencement or till the date of expiry of such policy, whichever is earlier."

In terms of this provision, the existing policies issu









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top