SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Ker) 70

S.SANKARASUBBAN, R.BHASKARAN
K. Bhaskaran Nair – Appellant
Versus
Habeeb Mohammed – Respondent


Judgment :-

Sankarasubban, J.

Plaintiff is the Appellant. Suit was filed for specific performance of an agreement to sell the plaint schedule property or in the alternative for return of the amount advanced.The case of the plaintiff is as follows:

2. The plaint schedule property belongs to defendants 1 and 2. Defendants 1 and 2 agreed to sell the plaint schedule property to the plaintiff for a total consideration of Rs.10 lakhs. The agreement was executed on 16.9.1988 and an advance amount of Rs. 1 lakh was given to the defendants. As per the agreement , the defendants agreed to execute the sale deed and put the plaintiff in possession of the property within one year.

3. The defendants did not execute the sale deed. The defendants violated the terms and conditions of agreement .Ultimately, the plaintiff sent lawyer notice on 5.1.1991 calling upon the defendants to execute the sale deed .A reply was given by the defendants stating false and baseless matters . The defendants are liable and bound to execute the sale deed in respect of the plaint schedule property. The plaintiff is entitled to get the sale deed executed. If for some reason the execution of the sale deed becomes impossible



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top