R.C.LAHOTI, B.N.AGARWAL
Sainuddin – Appellant
Versus
Sulaiman – Respondent
1. Leave to appeal granted in all the petitions.
2. The suit property is a building situated within the jurisdiction of rent control court of Kozhikode. The plan of the property shows that it is a shop with openings on two sides. Though the property is one, however, it has been numbered by the local authority by assigning two door Nos., i.e., door No. 6/481 and 6/482. The small corner of the shop situated between the openings on the two sides has been assigned No. 6/482 while the remaining entire shop is assigned door No. 6/481. The property was owned by Kunhilakshmi alias Leelamma and Others and held on tenancy by Nalakath Sainuddin, the appellant, on a monthly rent of Rs. 65/-, the tenancy being a single tenancy for door Nos. 6/481 and 6/482. The tenancy had commenced in the year 1969. Sometime in the year 1972, door No.6/482 was sublet by the appellant to the respondent Koorikadan Sulaiman on a monthly rent of Rs. 100/-. On 12.9.1988, the respondent purchased the entire property (ie., including both the doors) from the then owners of the property. The respondent then served a notice on the appellant calling upon him to surrender possession over the property in his pos
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.