SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Ker) 361

M.R.HARIHARAN NAIR
Nazir Annachi – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Judgment :-

Is the offence under section 411 of the Indian Penal Code a minor offence vis-a. vis section 380 of the I.P.C. ? Can one be convicted for the former offence without a specific charge accusing him of that offence and based on charge under section 380 for which he faced the trial? These are some of the questions posed in the present revision.

2. The appellant is the account accused in C.C.No 83/89 on the Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate - 1. Ernakulam. He is aggrieved that though the conviction entered against him by the trial court for offence under section 34 of the Indian Penal Code was set aside in section Crl.A. 141/92 by the Third Additional Sessions Court. Ernakulam the learned Sessions Judge proceeded to convict him for the offence under section 411 of the I.P.C.

3. Sri. C.B. Sreekumar who argued the case of the appellant submitted that in the absence of any charge under section 411 of the I.P.C. framed against the second accused, there was no question of convicting him for the said offence. It is also his case that the ingredients of section 411 of the I.P.C. stand unestablished in the case in so far as there is no evidence adduced to show that the seco

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top