Judges : KURIAN JOSEPH
Joseph Thomas - Appellant
Versus
Changanacherry Municipality - Respondent
Case No : O. P. No. 2608 of 2002
Decided On : 03/20/2002
Advocates Appeared :
J. Om Prakash For Petitioner Siby Mathew, A. A. Mohammed Nazir, Philip J. Vettickattu & George Johnson For Respondents
Kerala Municipality Act, 1994 – S. 271 272 275 565(1) 369 375 – Advertisement in Private Places – Does it require permission from the Municipality for exhibiting or erecting an advertisement even in a private place, is the question involved in the Original Petition – Petitioner is the owner of a building complex within the first respondent Municipality – Petitioner represented the unauthorized installation of the Board before the Secretary of the first respondent Municipality, as per Ext. P4 – By Ext. P5 the Secretary informed the petitioner that it is a matter of dispute between the petitioner and the tenant and hence the Municipality cannot interfere in the matter – The said communication Ext. P5 is under challenge in the Original Petition – It is the contention of the Municipality as well as the second respondent that no permission as such is necessary for the Municipality for erecting an advertisement board in a private place – The Municipality contends that only if the Board is put up in a public place, it requires permission – Held, while S.272 provides for written permission for an advertisement within the Municipal area, what S. 271 provides is liability to pay tax – True there are certain examples from payment of tax on advertisements including the exemption on advertisements in private places– Therefore, irrespective of the liability to pay tax, written permission of the Secretary of the Municipality is mandatory for displaying an advertisement or erecting advertisement board, whether it is in public place or not – Such a provision cannot also be said to be unreasonable, since consideration of public order, decency and morality require certain guidance in the matter, apart from the angle of planning as to the size, colour, graphics etc. of advertisements – Even without any rule made under S. 271 or S. 272, the legislative intend is manifest in S. 272 – Written permission of the Secretary of the Municipality is mandatory for placing an advertisement board or displaying an advertisement irrespective of the fact that the advertisement is in a public place or a private place – In the above circumstances Court set aside Ext. P5 and direct the first respondent to reconsider Ext. P4 with notice to the petitioner and the second respondent and if it is found that there is no permission by the second respondent for installing the advertisement board referred to in the petition, prompt action shall be taken under S.275 for removal of the unauthorised advertisement and other steps contemplated therein – The Original Petition is disposed of as above – Petition Disposed
Kurian Joseph, J.
Does it require permission from the Municipality for exhibiting or erecting an advertisement even in a private place, is the question involved in the Original Petition. Petitioner is the owner of a building complex within the first respondent Municipality. The second respondent is a tenant of one of the rooms. The second respondent put up an advertisement board of his shop in front of the building. True this is without the consent of the petitioner landlord. But the issue raised is that the advertisement board cannot be put up without obtaining permission from the first respondent Municipality. Petitioner represented the unauthorised installation of the Board before the Secretary of the first respondent Municipality, as per Ext. P4. By Ext. P5 the Secretary informed the petitioner that it is a matter of dispute between the petitioner and the tenant and hence the Municipality cannot interfere in the matter. The said communication Ext. P5 is under challenge in the Original Petition.
2. It is the contention of the Municipality as well as the second respondent that no permission as such is necessary for the Municipality for erecting an advertisement board in a private place. The Municipality contends that only if the Board is put up in a public place, it requires permission. Reliance is placed on the proviso to S.271 of the Kerala Municipality Act, 1994, The said section to the extent it is relevant is extracted below:
"271. Tax on advertisements. - Every person who erects, exhibits. Fixes or retains upon or over any land, building, wall, hoarding or structure in a Municipal area any advertisement or who displays any advertisement to public view in any manner whatsoever in any place in such area, whether public or private, shall pay on every such advertisement a tax calculated at such rates and in such manner and subject to such exemptions as the Council with the approval of the Government, by resolution determine:
XXX XXX XXX XXX
Provided also that no such tax shall be levied on any advertisement which is not a sky sign and which
(a) is exhibited within the window of any building which is not a public place: or
(b) relates to the trade or business carried on within the land or building upon or over which such advertisement is exhibited, or to any sale or letting of such land or building or any effects therein or to any sale, entertainment or meeting to be held upon or in the same; or
(c) relates to the name of the land or building upon or over which the advertisement is exhibited, or to the name of the owner or occupier of such land or building; or (d)relates to the business of any railway administration; or
( e ) is exhibited within any railway station or upon any wall or other property of a railway administration except any portion of the surface of such wall or property fronting any street". emphasis supplied)
It is to be noted that S.271 relates only to tax on advertisement. The issue of permission as such is dealt with under S.272(1), which reads as follows:
"272. Prohibition of advertisement without written permission of the Secretary. -
(1) No advertisement shall, after the levy of the tax under S.271 has been determined upon the Council, be erected, exhibited. Fixed or retained upon or over any land, building, wall, hoarding or structure within the municipal area or shall be displayed in any manner whatsoever in any place in that area without the written permission of the Secretary. " (emphasis supplied)
A reading of S.272 (1) would clearly indicate that once it is resolved by the Municipality to levy tax on advertisement, irrespective of the fact that whether tax is leviable or not, no advertisement shall be erected, exhibited, fixed or retained over any land, building, wall, hoarding or structure within the municipal area or no advertisement shall be displayed within the municipal area without the written permission of the Secretary. The only exemption under S.272 is in respect of the advertisement by
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.