SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Ker) 178

M.R.HARIHARAN NAIR
Thulaseedasan – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

M.R. Hariharan Nair, J.

A new question has been raised before me in this case and that is whether for the purpose of proper compliance with Section 42(2) of the N.D.P.S. Act the report that should reach the immediate official superior should actually be a copy of the record and not the original.

2. The appellant stands convicted for the offence under Section 20(b)(i) of the N.D.P.S. Act. It was alleged that at about 4.30 p.m. on 16.3.2000, PW1- Circle Inspector of Police, received the information that a person riding a motorcycle was coming with ganja carried in a bag; that accordingly Pw1 along with his police party intercepted the vehicle while it was still in motion and in the subsequent search it was revealed that the bag possessed by the accused was containing 1.05 Kgs. Of ganja. After preparing the necessary sample and after recording the details in a contemporaneous seizure mahazar, the arrested accused and the seized contraband were removed to the police station and steps proceeded with.

3. The trial court found based on the evidence of Pws. 1 to 7 and Exts. P1 to P21 and on a consideration of Mos. 1 to 4 that the aforesaid evidence was acceptable. The accused was























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top