SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Ker) 643

K.THANKAPPAN, J.B.KOSHY
Sally Mathew – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

Koshy, J.

Short question to be decided in these two writ appeals is whether a language teacher with L.T.T.C. (Language Teachers' Training Certificate) or with Vidwan title can be appointed as Headmistress in U.P. School or L.P. School. In other words, whether L.T.T.C. can be treated as equivalent to B.Ed., T.T.C. or T.C.H. or equivalent training qualification prescribed. Rule 45 Chapter XIV A of the Kerala Education Rules, 1959 (for short KER), deals with appointment of Headmaster in U.P. Schools and Rule 45A deals with appointment of a Headmaster in L.P.School. W.A.No. 61 of 1999 deals with appointment of a Headmaster in an U.P.School and W.A.No. 383 of 2001 deals with appointment of a Headmaster in an L.P.School. In O.P.No. 12561 of 1998 (W.A. 383 of 2001), the learned Single Judge held that L.T.T.C. is not an equivalent qualification to T.T.C., T.C.H. or an equivalent training qualification for appointment as a primary assistant. Hence, in the absence of any approved training qualification a teacher with L.T.T.C. cannot be appointed as Headmaster in an L.P. School whereas, another learned Single Judge in the impugned judgment in O.P. No. 17324/98 (W.A.No. 61 of 1999)



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top