SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Ker) 435

N.KRISHNAN NAIR
Sasseriyil Joseph – Appellant
Versus
Devassia – Respondent


Judgment :-

This appeal has been preferred by the complainant in C.C. No. 449/91 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Mattannur, against the Judgment of acquittal passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thalassery in Cri. Appeal No. 212/92 dated 28-8-1993. The case arose on a complaint filed by the appellant herein against the respondent alleging the commission of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. After the trial, the Magistrate found the respondent (accused) guilty of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and convicted him. He was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 15, 000/-, in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months. Aggrieved by the order of conviction and sentence, the respondent herein preferred Cri. Appeal No. 212 of 1992. The learned Additional Sessions Judge set aside the conviction and sentence imposed upon the respondent and acquitted him. Aggrieved by the order of acquittal passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, the complainant has come up with this appeal.

2. The case of the complainant in brief is that the accused in discharge of a loan of Rs. 12, 000/









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top