SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Ker) 26

K.K.USHA, R.RAJENDRA BABU
Jose Antony – Appellant
Versus
Official Liquidator – Respondent


Judgment :-

R. Rajendra Babu, J. This appeal is at the instance of the applicant in C.A.No. 25//98 in C.P. 20/94 on the file of this Court (Company Court). The applicant, the Managing Director of M/ s. Belhouse Associates (P) Ltd., who was an accused in C.C. No. 456/96 pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court, Ernakulam, filed C.A. 25//98 before the Company Court to stay the above proceedings invoking S.446 of the Companies Act. The company court dismissed the above application and the above order is under challenge in this appeal.

2. The 2nd respondent herein (complainant) filed C.C. 456/96 before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court, Ernakulam against the applicant and M/s. Belhouse Associates (P) Ltd., a company under liquidation, for the commission of an offence under S.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. It was alleged that a cheque for Rs. 1,12,000/- issued by the accused on 19.1.96 towards discharge of a liability to the complainant for the electrical works done by them, was dishonoured when presented for encashment, due to the insufficiency of funds in the accounts in the name of the accused and they had not cared to pay the amount inspi




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top