SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Ker) 149

A.R.LAKSHMANAN, D.SREEDEVI
T. K. Sankaran Kutty – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

Dr. AR, LAKSHMANAN, J.

Heard Mr. Bhaskaran Pillai for the appellant and Mr. Alexander Thomas, Government Pleader for the respondents.

2. The appellant as petitioner filed O.P. No. 4437 of 2000 to quash Ext. P5 government order and Ext. P6 order passed by the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Thrissur in C.M.P. No. 5 of 2000 in C.C. No. 3 of 1998 dated 31st January, 2000 and to declare that the continuation of the proceedings in C.C. No. 3 of 1998 now pending before the Vigilance Court and Enquiry Tribunal is an abuse of the process of Court. A preliminary investigation was conducted against the appellant who was working as an Assistant Surgeon in the District Hospital, Thrissur on the basis of a complaint Ext. P1 filed by one Sabu Sadanandan. Investigation was conducted by the Inspector attached to Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau, Thrissur and on culmination of the same the Deputy Superintendent attached to the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau, Thrissur registered Crime Case No. 7/96 against the appellant under S. 13(i)(d) read with S. 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Investigation in the offence was thereupon conducted by two Inspectors wh








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top