SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Ker) 147

M.R.HARIHARAN NAIR
Vikraman Unnithan – Appellant
Versus
Koshy M. Koshy – Respondent


Judgment :-

M.R. Hariharan Nair, J.

The petitioner is the returned candidate from Ward No. 8 of Thazhakkara Village in the Panchayat Elections held in 1995. O.P. 6/1995 was filed before the Election Tribunal (Munsiff, Mavelikkara) by the first respondent herein challenging the validity of the election. As per order dated 14.10.1997 the Election Tribunal accepted the contention of the present revision petitioner who was first respondent in the O.P. that the O.P. was not properly presented and dismissed the same under S.93(1) of the Panchayat Raj Act. The present first respondent thereupon took up the matter before the District Judge, Alappuzha who is the designated authority to hear appeals with regard to election matters. As per the impugned order the learned District Judge allowed the appeal and found that the election petition was properly filed and directed the Election Tribunal to proceed with the petition in accordance with law.

2. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner placed reliance on S.89(1) Panchayat Raj Act which insists that election petitions should be presented in person. I was also taken through the decision reported in Saraswathy v. Kamala & Ors. (1997(1) KL










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top