SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Ker) 105

K.A.MOHAMMED SHAFI
Radhakrishnan Nair – Appellant
Versus
Padmanabhan – Respondent


Judgment :-

K.A. Mohammed Shafi, J.

This revision petition is filed by the accused in C.C. No. 474/96 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court-II, Thrissur challenging the judgment passed by the trial court on 19.6.1999 as modified by the Sessions Court, Thrissur, in Crl. Appeal No. 270/1999 by judgment dated 30.10.1999.

2. The revision petitioner was prosecuted for the offence punishable under S.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on the basis of the complaint filed by the complainant, 1st respondent herein. The trial court found him guilty, convicted and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- in default of payment to undergo S.I. for three months and directed payment of fine, if realised, to the complainant being compensation under S.357 of Cr.P.C. The accused challenged the judgment before the Sessions Court, Thrissur in Crl.A. No. 270/99. The Sessions Court, Thrissur by judgment dated 30.10.99 confirmed the finding of guilt and conviction and modified the sentence. Accordingly the appellate court sentenced the accused to undergo imprisonment till rising of the court and to pay Rs. 1,10,000/- as compensation in default of payment of compensation to under








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top