SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Ker) 208

K.A.ABDUL GAFOOR
Muhammed – Appellant
Versus
Moideen Haji – Respondent


Judgment :-

K.A. Abdul Gafoor, J,

The plaintiffs who lost the suit concurrently before the courts below are the appellants. The suit is of representative character. The dispute raised in the suit is as to whether religious discourse called 'Khutuba' in a mosque in connection with the juma prayer on Friday can also be in vernacular along with its essential ingredients in Arabic. In other words, whether the gathering can be addressed in local language during the course of the 'Khutuba' itself. There was a contention that this was not a matter for resolution by civil courts and therefore the suit was not maintainable. The trial Court accepted that contention and held that such a dispute cannot be said to be "one which the Court is entitled to decide". As there was dispute on the issue among the members of the congregation, the Assistant Collector had initiated proceedings, M.C. 21/67, and had issued Ext. Al order that'A party' therein shall not interfere with the performance of 'Khutuba'in Malayalam in the mosque, namely Karakunnu Juma-ath-Mosque. Therefore, that order was challenged in the suit. Consequently, injunction was also prayed for to restrain conduct of 'Khutuba' in Malayalam









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top