SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Ker) 350

K.A.MOHAMMED SHAFI, K.NARAYANA KURUP
Kunhabdulla – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

K. Narayana Kurup, J.

The dispute highlighted in this batch of Writ Petitions which have been referred to us by a learned Single judge relates to the de-novo de-limitation of wards in the various Grama Panchayats in the State by the State Election Commission (for short'Election Commission') in the purported exercise of his power under S.10A of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act (for short 'the Act') in flagrant violation of his own guidelines and well settled principles of law resulting in upsetting the de-limitation of wards ordered by the District Collector - who is the delegate of the Election Commission - after an elaborate exercise of local inspection, publication of preliminary notification, final notification, hearing of affected parties etc. Petitioners allege that the Election Commission has done so with the mala-fide intention of dancing to the tune of the political parties in power which amounts to gerrymandering and which is objectionable in law. It is, therefore, prayed that the orders of de-limitation passed by the Election Commission under S.10A of the

Act be quashed as utterly mala-fide, totally introducing new boundaries which are not there at all. In some case




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top