SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Ker) 258

Judges : K.NARAYANA KURUP,K.V.SANKARANARAYANAN
Jumbo Circus - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
Case No : O.P. No. 155 of 1999 & connected cases
Decided On : 06/06/2000
Advocates Appeared :
S.K. Chathurvedi & M. Pathrose Mathai For Petitioners Raj Panjwani, Ashok Kumar & Sajan Sreeraj For Respondents

Headnote:

Constitution of India, Article226 - Withdrawn- Struck Down- Illegal- Context- Notification is liable to be struck down as illegal and unconstitutional - Per contra Senior Counsel Court appearing for respondents submitted that impugned notification is perfectly valid and well within powers of authority who issued said notification and same is not liable to be struck down for all any of grounds canvassed by petitioners - It was also contended that petitioners having approached this Court suppressing material facts which has bearing on case they are liable to be non-suited at threshold on that short ground -Held, Recognize and protect their rights - In context Court may ask why not our educational institutions offer course on Animal Rights Law with an emphasis on fundamental rights as has been done by Harvard Law School recently - If humans are entitled to fundamental rights why not animals - In our considered opinion legal rights shall not be exclusive preserve of the humans which has to be extended beyond people thereby dismantling thick legal wall with humans all on one side and all non-human animals on other side -Petition dismissed

Judgment :-

K. Narayana Kurup, J.

By virtue of the powers conferred under sub-cl. (ii) of S.22 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 (for short 'the act), the Govt. of India had issued a notification dated 2.3.1991 banning the training and exhibition of five animals, viz. bears, monkeys, tigers, panthers and dogs. Subsequently, a corrigendum dated 7.8.1991 was issued by which the ban on training and exhibition of dogs was withdrawn. The validity of the said notifications were challenged by the Indian Circus Federation (ICF), New Delhi by filing Civil Writ Petition No. 890/91 before the High Court of Delhi. The High Court of Delhi by order dated 20.3.1991 stayed the operation of the notification dated 2.3.1991. Later, the High Court of Delhi after hearing the writ petitioner at length, by its order dated 21.8.1997 ordered that:

"The Government may take up the Notification dt. 2.3.1991 for consideration afresh. It may take into consideration such materials as may be available with it or it may choose to collect through any of the authentic agencies or such other agency or committee of experts as it may choose to appoint. The petitioners and such other organisations, as may volunteer themselves, will be at liberty to place before the Government of India for its consideration such materials as they may deem relevant and having bearing on the issue involved."

Pursuant to the aforesaid order of the Delhi High Court the Govt. of India constituted a committee consisting of:

1. Addl.IGF(WL) - Chairman

2. Director, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun - Member

3. Member Secretary, Central Zoo Authority - Member

4. Shri S.C. Dey, Add.IGF(Rtd.) - Member

5. Director, Animal Welfare - Member Secretary

The said Committee after hearing all the affected parties submitted its report to the Central Government. The Central Government on the basis of the report of the Committee, the advice tendered by the Animal Welfare Board of India and the materials placed before it and that which was filed before the High Court of Delhi, issued a notification dated 14.10.1998 specifying that the following animals shall not be exhibited or trained as a performing animal with effect from the date of publication of the notification: bears, monkeys, tigers, panthers and lions. The Indian Circus Federation thereafter filed an application under S.151 of the CPC in the above Writ Petition before the High Court of Delhi praying that the notification dated 14.10.1998 be stayed during the pendency of the writ petition. Simultaneously another writ petition No. 6490/98 was filed by the All India Circus Employees Union before the High Court of Delhi challenging the said notification. In the meantime, the application under S.151 C.P.C. filed in Civil Writ Petition No. 890/91 came up for hearing on 16.12.1998 on which date the High Court of Delhi dismissed the application for stay filed by the ICF and prima facie upheld the validity of the notification dated 14.10.1998. Later, the Circus Employees Union filed an application dated 9.2.1999 bearing CM No. 2213/99 in Civil Writ Petition No. 6490/98 seeking to withdraw the said writ petition. Consequent on the said application for withdrawal, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 12.3.1999. The present batch of writ petitions were filed before this court in the year 1999 evidently to over-reach the order dated 16.12.1998 by which the High Court of Delhi had upheld the validity of the notification dated 14.10.1998 which is marked as Ext. PI in all these writ petitions. A learned Single Judge before whom the writ petitions came up for hearing, referred the matter to the Division Bench "having regard to the national importance and any interference with the above order will affect large number of persons inside and outside the State." Accordingly, the petitions were placed before us for hearing. The challenge in these original petitions is directed against the validity of Ext. PI notification dated 14.10.











































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top