SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Ker) 243

J.B.KOSHY
Shoukathali – Appellant
Versus
Tahsildar – Respondent


Judgment :-

J.B. Koshy, J.

Petitioner constructed a building and construction was completed in 1995. As per the Building Tax Act the building is a taxable event on the completion of the construction. Therefore, petitioner filed return and building was assessed by Ext P1. Petitioner had paid the amount in instalments. Thereafter, Ext P3 notice was issued followed by Ext P4 order rectifying the assessment under S.15(3) of the Act on the ground that on the date of assessment rate of tax was changed. Normally, assessment should be based on the rate as fixed on the taxable event Here the taxable event is on the date of completion of the building and assessment was made correctly.

2. The Revenue relied on S.5(2) of the Act. But S.5(2) is applicable only for the buildings constructed before the appointed day when method of appointment was changed. The assessments were pending for whatever reason including filing of appeal Here, admittedly, the building was constructed after the appointed day and therefore, S.5(2) has no application at all and assessment can be made on the basis of taxable event. In this connection, I refer to the judgment of this court in O.P. No. 1631 of 1999. Apart from t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top