SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Ker) 259

K.NARAYANA KURUP, K.A.MOHAMMED SHAFI
Special Tahsildar (L. A. ) – Appellant
Versus
Kallu – Respondent


Judgment :-

K. Narayana Kurup, J.

This appeal by the State is preferred against the judgment of the learned Single Judge in O.P. No. 14598 of 1996 allowing the Original Petition and holding that the question as to whether reference application was preferred in time or not is to be considered by the reference court and not by the Collector. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of the appeal are as follows: The respondent herein is the wife of late Mundiyan Munhikannan who passed away on 5.4.1994. An extent of 0.0189 hectares of land in Survey No. 68/8-A and an extent of 0.0094 hectares of land in Survey No. 68/9 of Kadambur amson was acquired from the possession of the respondent's husband pursuant to an award dated 18.3.1994. According to the respondent, the compensation awarded was too low and hence application was made for reference under S.18 of the Land Acquisition Act (for short 'the Act'). The said application for reference was rejected by the Tahsildar, the 1st appellant herein vide Ext. P2 communication dated 10.7.1996 on the ground that it was filed beyond the time fixed under S.18 of the Act. As already noticed the award was passed on 18.3.1994.

Notice of award was s







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top