SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Ker) 167

M.R.HARIHARAN NAIR
Moosa – Appellant
Versus
Jyothi – Respondent


Judgment :-

M.R. Hariharan Nair, J.

The question that arises for consideration is whether a court which executes the order of eviction passed by a Rent Control Court has got the right to eider restitution.

2. The revision petitioner obtained an order of eviction under S.11(2)(b) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, (Act 2/1965) against the respondent herein from the Rent Control Court, Kalpetta in R-CP. No. 34 of 1994. In execution of the order, petitioner got delivery. The tenant then filed an application under S.11(2)(c) of the Act and that was allowed. The landlord has taken up that order in appeal and it is pending. In the meantime, on the strength of the order under S.11(2)(c) of the Act, the tenant moved the execution court seeking re-delivery. As per the impugned order, the Execution Court allowed the petition of the tenant for re-delivery in view of the subsequent order under S.11(2)(c) of the Act and that is the order impugned herein.

3. The revision petitioner contends that the execution court has no jurisdiction to invoke power under S.144 of the C.P.C. and that such a petition has to be moved before court which passed the order for eviction. The tenant wou













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top