SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Ker) 310

Judges : K.A.MOHAMED SHAFI
Abraham - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala - Respondent
Case No : Crl.M.C.6310, 6335 of 1999 & etc.
Decided On : 07/12/2000
Advocates Appeared :
K.C. Peter, K.K. Chandran Pillai, T. Devassia, C. Krishnan & A. Mohamed Mustaque For Petitioners Additional Director General of Prosecution (MM. Mathew) For Respondents

Headnote:

Kerala,Gaming Act 1960 Section 7 & 8 &5 & 6 - legal - compliance - - allegation - punishable - Alleged that on accused to were found engaged in gaming called ' building owned by petitioner- Accused at and playing cards and amount of were seized from scene of occurrence while accused were arrested - Filed by accused file of Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court challenging order dismissing petition filed by petitioners seeking discharge - Allegation made against petitioners and respondent herein is that they were engaged in gaming at about Arts and Sports Club situated at mile area in Ward of in Village - Held, That is fact to established in evidence - Therefore question of applicability offence punishable under Section in those cases is matter to be considered by trial court - It is clear from my foregoing discussions that contention of petitioners that prosecution proceedings initiated against them alleging offences punishable under Section and of Kerala Gaming Act are liable to be quashed since there is absolutely no allegation in charge-sheet laid against them or any material on record to effect that they were engaged in gaming in common gaming house and alleged search seizure and arrest of petitioners are non-compliance of mandatory provisions of Section of Act cannot be accepted at this stage - Petitions dismissed

Judgment :-

K.A. Mohamed Shafi, J.

Since the contentions raised in all these Crl.M.C.s. are identical, they are heard and disposed of by this common order, though the petitioners in these M.Cs. are different. In all these cases the petitioners who are the accused are standing trial for the offences punishable under Ss.7 and 8 of the Kerala Gaming Act.

2. Crl.M.C.1149/2000 is filed by the accused in S.T. No. 202/2000 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Ettumanoor to quash the entire proceedings against them. The allegation made against the petitioners is that on 3.1.2000 petitioners 1 to 11 were found engaged in gaming at the Jyothis Arts and Sports Club situated in building No. 118, Ward No. 9 of Kidangoor Panchayat owned by the 12th petitioner-nth accused and the playing cards and amount found were seized and the accused were

arrested.

3. The petitioner in Crl.M.C. No. 1360/2000 is accused No. 16 in S.T.C. No. 8/99 on the file of the judicial First Class Magistrate's Court-I, Kannur. The allegation made against him is that on 22.8.98 at about 5.15 p.m. accused Nos.1 to 17 were found engaged in gaming for gain in the upstair portion of building No. PP X/485 of Pallikunnu Panchayat wherein the Chalad Recreation Club and Udaya Vayanasala are being conducted and they were arrested and the playing cards and Rs. 5820/- were seized from them.

4. Crl. M.C. 6310/99 is filed by the accused in S.T. No. 185/99 pending before the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Kattappana. It is alleged that on 21.2.99 accused 2 to 17 were found engaged in gaming called' j)" in the building owned by the 1st petitioner-1st accused at Kattappana and the playing cards and amount of Rs. 13602/- were seized from the scene of occurrence while the accused were

arrested.

5. Crl.M.C. 6335/99 is filed by accused 1,2 and 4 to 11 in S.T. No. 56/99 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Kattappana challenging the order in C.M.P. No. 3009/99 dated 20.7.99 dismissing the petition filed by the petitioners seeking discharge. The allegation made against the petitioners and the 2nd respondent herein is that they were engaged in gaming at about 9.15 p.m. on 11.11.98 in the Yuvaresmi Arts and Sports Club situated at 10th mile area in Ward No. Ill of Kalvarimount kara in Thankamani Village. The learned Magistrate rejected the contention of the petitioners that they were only playing cards and not gambling and no prima facie case punishable under Ss.7 and 8 of the Gaming Act is made out against them.

6. The petitioners in all these cases have contended that they were only engaged in playing cards for pleasure at the respective places and they were not gaming or playing for gain as alleged by the prosecution. They have also contended that there is no allegation that they were engaged in gaming in a common gaming house. They have further contended that the mandatory provisions of S.5 of the Kerala Gaming Act are not complied with regard to the alleged search and seizure in these cases. Therefore, according to them, absolutely no material is available in these cases to make out a prima facie case involving offences punishable under Ss.7 and 8 of the Kerala Gaming Act against them and therefore, the entire proceedings initiated against them should be quashed.

7. The counsel for the petitioners submitted that consistent view is taken by this Court from the year 1964 onwards that gaming in private place is not gaming in a common gaming house as defined in S.2(a) of the Kerala Gaming Act so as to attract the penal provisions of Ss.7 and 8 of the Act. S.2(a) of the Kerala Gaming Act defines common gaming house which reads as follows:

"2. Definitions- In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,

(a) 'common gaming house' means any house, room, tent, enclosure, vehicle, vessel or any place whatsoever in which cards, dice, tables or other instruments of gaming are kept or used for the profit or gain of the person owning, occupying, using































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top