1999 Supreme(Ker) 69
Judges : K.A.MOHAMED SHAFI
Rosamma Thomas - Appellant
Versus
C.I.of Police - Respondent
Case No : Crl.M.C. No. 2277 of 1995
Decided On : 02/09/1999
Advocates Appeared :
M.C. Nambiar For Petitioners T.A. Shaji & Public Prosecutor (V.V. Nandagopal) For Respondents
The change of religion by members of scheduled tribe will not deprive their status as members of a scheduled tribe.
Headnote:
Scheduled Castes & the Scheduled Tribes (Prevented of Atrocities) Act - Accused's Petition to Quash F.I.R. - S.3(1)(x) - [SCHEDULED TRIBES, S.3(1)(x)] - The court discussed the status of scheduled tribes, the impact of conversion to Christianity on the status of a member of a scheduled tribe, and the interpretation of the provisions of the Scheduled Castes & the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court emphasized that the status of scheduled tribes is not determined by the religion they profess but by virtue of the tribe and the region they inhabit. It also highlighted that the change of religion by members of scheduled tribe will not deprive their status as members of a scheduled tribe. The court dismissed the petition, stating that the allegations made in the F.I. statement were sufficient to constitute an offence punishable under S.3(1)(x) of the Act.
Fact of the Case:
The accused filed a petition to quash the F.I.R. alleging offence punishable under S.3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes & the Scheduled Tribes (Prevented of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The crime was registered based on the complaint filed by the third respondent, alleging that the accused insulted and humiliated him by calling his scheduled tribe name in public view.
Finding of the Court:
The court dismissed the petition, stating that the allegations made in the F.I. statement were sufficient to constitute an offence punishable under S.3(1)(x) of the Act.
Issues: The status of scheduled tribes, the impact of conversion to Christianity on the status of a member of a scheduled tribe, and the interpretation of the provisions of the Scheduled Castes & the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The status of scheduled tribes is not determined by the religion they profess but by virtue of the tribe and the region they inhabit. The change of religion by members of scheduled tribe will not deprive their status as members of a scheduled tribe.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition, stating that the allegations made in the F.I. statement were sufficient to constitute an offence punishable under S.3(1)(x) of the Act.
K.A. Mohamed Shafi, J.
This petition is filed by the accused in crime No. 39/95 registered by Panangad police alleging offence punishable under S.3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes & the Scheduled Tribes (Prevented of Atrocities) Act, 1989 to quash the F.I.R. under S.482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
2. The crime is registered against the petitioners on the basis of the complaint filed by the third respondent before the Circle Inspector of Police, Tripunithura and forwarded by him to the Sub Inspector of Police, Panangad for appropriate action. The allegation made against the petitioners is that the petitioners who do not belong to the scheduled caste or scheduled tribe with intent to insult and humiliate the third respondent who is a member of scheduled tribe have abused him by calling him scheduled tribe name in public view and thereby they have committed the offence under S.3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes & the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
3. The petitioners have filed this petition to quash the F.I.R. alleging that the third respondent does not belong to scheduled tribe and that no ingredients of the offence punishable under S.3(1)(x) of the Act is alleged in the F.I. statement and that mere calling the caste name or the tribal name will not constitute an offence punishable under S.3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
4. The case of the third respondent is that he belongs to Mala Araya community which is a scheduled tribe. The petitioners vehemently contented that the third respondent is a Christian which faith does not recognise any caste system. Therefore, the third respondent does not come within the ambit of Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The third respondent contended that though the status of the members belonging to the scheduled castes is determined on the basis of their caste, the status of the members of scheduled tribe is not determined on the basis of the caste or religion they profess, but by virtue of the tribe and the region they inhabit. Therefore, according to him, the profession of faith or change of religion do not have any impact on the status of the members of scheduled tribes as in the case of the member of scheduled castes.
5. The fact that third respondent is a follower of Christianity is not in dispute. Therefore, the petitioners contended that though the third respondent had enjoyed the status of scheduled tribe while he was professing Hindu religion, by conversion into Christianity he lost that status and became a member of Christianity which does not recognise any caste system. In support of the contention that a person converted from Mala Araya tribe into Christianity cannot be treated as a member of schedule caste or scheduled tribe, the petitioners relied upon the decision of a single judge of this Court in Chandramohanan v. S.I. of Police, (1996 (1) KLT 76
"Under Arts.341 and 342oftlieConstitution,listofScheduledCastesandScheduledTribes are published in relation to the State of Kerala. Going by the list, i t is seen that "Mala Arayans" are treated as Scheduled Tribes. B u t Mala Arayans, who are converted into Christianity, are not treated as members of the Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe."
6. In that case the victim was a born Christian since their parents who originally belonged to Mala Araya community which was considered to be a scheduled tribe in the State of Kerala embraced Christianity and she was born to them after they became Christians. So the learned Single Judge of this Court found that she can be treated only as a Christian by birth and as Christianity does not recognise any caste system or scheduled castes and scheduled tribes, they cannot be treated as members of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes.
7. Apart from stating that Mala Arayans who converted into Christianity are not treated as members of the scheduled castes or scheduled tribes and in the list of