S.SANKARASUBBAN
Varghese – Appellant
Versus
Devi Academy – Respondent
S. Sankarasubban, J.
Plaintiffs are the petitioners. The suit was instituted for money. According to them, for the second plaintiff, the first plaintiff made a cash deposit of Rs. 1,15,000/- with the first defendant and the suit was filed to recover the same. Along with the suit, a court fee of Rs. 835/-was paid. The balance court fee of Rs. 8,340 was paid not in time. The balance court fee ought to have been paid on 21.8.1997.
2. According to the plaintiffs, the case was posted for issues on 7.8.1997. But on that date the plaintiffs and counsel were absent because of an inadvertant mistake in noting the posting date as 1.9.1997 instead of 7.8.1997. Issues were framed and the case was posted on 21.8.1997 for paying balance court fee. But the counsel for the plaintiffs was under the impression that the case was posted on 1.9.1997. He was not present in court on 21.8.1997. Hence the balance court fee was not paid on that date. On 21.8.1997, the plaint was rejected for non-payment of balance court fee. On 3.9.1997 the plaintiffs filed an application under S.151 of the Code of Civil Procedure supported by an affidavit stating the circumstances under which the balance court fe
Followed: AIR 1959 Ker. 406; AIR 1922 PC 112 & 26 Trav.LJ 932
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.