SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Ker) 116

K.A.MOHAMMED SHAFI
A. N. Nadarajan – Appellant
Versus
K. C. Nadarajan – Respondent


Judgment :-

The complainant in C.C. 546/92 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court, Kottayam is the appellant.

2. The appellant filed complaint before the lower Court against the 1st respondent alleging offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. According to the appellant, the 1st respondent conducted a private chitty in gold in which the appellant subscribed one ticket and deposited 148 grams of gold in the chitty. Since the 1st respondent did not possess sufficient quantity of gold to pay back to the appellant he agreed to pay Rs. 49,000/- being the value of 148 grams of gold. In order to discharge that liability the 1st respondent issued two cheques for Rs. 22,400/- dated 25-3-92 and Rs. 26,600/- dated 2-4-92 drawn on Kumaranelloor Service Co-operative Bank in favour of the appellant. When the cheques were presented for encashment, they were dishonoured for want of sufficient funds to the credit of the 1st respondent. Though the 1st respondent received the notice caused to be sent on behalf of the appellant intimating about the dishonour of the cheques and calling upon him to pay the amount, he has not paid the amount. Therefore, he is g






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top