SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Ker) 152

SUJATA V.MANOHAR, D.P.MOHAPATRA, R.C.LAHOTI
State of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
Y. R. Kalliyanikutty – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. Leave granted in S.L.P. (C) No. 12051 of 1988.

2. All these appeals raise a common question of law whether a debt which is barred by the law of limitation can be recovered by resorting to recovery proceedings under the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act of 19 68. A Division Bench of the Kerala High Court in the impugned common judgment dated 2.11.1987 in C.A. No. 4211 of 1988, C.A. No. 4393 of 1988 and C.A. No. 4175 of 1988 held that the absence of any provision in the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act creating a substantive right to recover time-barred debts, the said Act which provides for summary recovery cannot be availed of once the period prescribed for recovery under the Limitation Act has expired. This judgment of the Division Bench of the Kerala High Court was followed by a subsequent Division Bench in its judgment dated 29.1.1988 which is the subject matter of appeal arising from S.L.P. (C) No. 12051 of 1988. The above decisions of the Division Bench how ever have been overruled by a Full Bench of the Kerala High Court by its judgment dated 10.4.1996 which is the judgment under appeal in C.A. Nos. 12393 and 12394 of 1996. All these appeals have, therefore, been heard tog



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top