R. Rajendra Babu, J.

This revision is at the instance of the appellant/ tenant in R.C.A. 23/1989 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Authority, Alappuzha, The landlord-respondent filed R.C.P.1/i986 before the Rent Control Court, Alappuzha claiming recovery of the tenanted building under S.11(2) (b) and 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, for short the Act. The Rent Control Court allowed recovery both under S.11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act. The appeal filed by the tenant was R.C.A. 23/1989 before the Appellate Authority, Alappuzha, was dismissed upholding the order of the Rent Control Court. Aggrieved by the above order, the tenant has come up before this Court in revision under S.20 of the Act.

2. The landlord filed R.C.P. 1/1936 for recovery of the building under S.11(2)(b) alleging that the tenant had defaulted in paying the rent from April 3985 onwards at the rate of Rs. 50/- per month and that he bona fide needed the building for his residence along with the members of his family after making necessary modifications to the building and that he had no other building or property of his own. The tenant- revision petitioner filed objection den