SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Ker) 305

K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
Abdul Azeez Kunju – Appellant
Versus
District Supply Officer – Respondent


Judgment :-

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.

Petitioner is an authorised ration dealer of shop No. 217 of Harippad Taluk. His dealership was cancelled by the second respondent by Ext. P1 order dated 21.5.1999. Cancellation was effected under Clause 45(8) of the Kerala Rationing Order, 1966. Order refers to a report of the Rationing Inspector, Karuvatta dated 20.5.1999. Report pointed out misappropriation of 4047 litres of kerosene by writing 5 litres of kerosene in the records of RCS and also unauthorised sales, however, was made to the misappropriation of 132.500 Kgs. rice by writing in the Nalvazhy but not issued to card holders by entering into the ration cards. Various other infirmities were also pointed out.

2. Counsel for petitioner submitted that before taking drastic steps for cancellation of ARD no notice was given to the petitioner. Learned Government Pleader submitted that as per clause 45(8) of the Rationing Order the authority has got the power to suspend the appointment of the Authorised Retail Distributor temporarily pending enquiry if the authority is satisfied and it is considered necessary to do so without notice. The relevant clause is extracted below:

"If the District Collec






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top