SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Ker) 286

UMESH C.BANERJEE, K.T.THOMAS, D.P.MOHAPATRA
Jogendra Nahak – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. Leave granted.

2. A strange motion has been made before the High Court of Orissa by four persons who are strangers to a criminal case for direction to a Magistrate to record their statements under S.164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'the Code'). The High Court which initially issued such a direction later resiled there from and revoked the order on a second thought and mulcted the aforesaid four persons with compensatory costs. They filed this appeal by special leave.

3. The backdrop of the above order can be summarised thus: In an incident which happened on 12.8.1997 at Janumi Village (Ganjam District, Orissa) one Balaram Mohanty and his son sustained injuries and later the said Mohanty succumbed to the injuries. F.I.R. was registered with Purusottampur Police Station on the information supplied by Bhagaban Mohanty, brother of the deceased. One Jagadish Murty and three others were arrayed as accused in the F.I.R. and investigation was commenced thereon. On completion of the investigation final report was laid by the police before the Magistrate against the said accused persons. According to the present four appellants, though they were interrogated by





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top