ARIJIT PASAYAT, K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
Anilkumar – Appellant
Versus
Beena – Respondent
K.S. Radhakrishan, J.
Question that has come up for consideration in this case is whether a qualified Upper Primary School Assistant (Science) retrenched from service for want of vacancy could claim the benefit of rule 51A of Chapter XIV-A of the Kerala Education Rules for appointment in the post of a language teacher i.e. U.P.S.A. (Hindi) Learned single judge accepted the plea on the ground that the post of UPS A (Science) and the language teacher (UPSA-Hindi) carried the same scale of pay, in the same cadre, and included in the same seniority list. Appellant, aggrieved by the said finding, has come up in appeal.
2. We refer to the parties as they are arrayed in the Writ Petition. Petitioner was appointed as UPSA (Science) in the St. Mary's U.P. School on 15.7.1992. Her appointment was approved and later she was retrenched from the school for want of vacancy during 1995-96 staff fixation. She was again appointed in a leave vacancy as UPSA (Science) from 12.9.1995 to 13.12.1995, from 6.1.1997 to 26.3.1997 and from 4.6.1997 to 1.9.1997. All the appointments were approved. Accordingly petitioner acquired a right under Rule 51A of Chapter XIV-A of the K.E.R. for future appoi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.