SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Ker) 509

ARIJIT PASAYAT, K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
Anilkumar – Appellant
Versus
Beena – Respondent


Judgment :-

K.S. Radhakrishan, J.

Question that has come up for consideration in this case is whether a qualified Upper Primary School Assistant (Science) retrenched from service for want of vacancy could claim the benefit of rule 51A of Chapter XIV-A of the Kerala Education Rules for appointment in the post of a language teacher i.e. U.P.S.A. (Hindi) Learned single judge accepted the plea on the ground that the post of UPS A (Science) and the language teacher (UPSA-Hindi) carried the same scale of pay, in the same cadre, and included in the same seniority list. Appellant, aggrieved by the said finding, has come up in appeal.

2. We refer to the parties as they are arrayed in the Writ Petition. Petitioner was appointed as UPSA (Science) in the St. Mary's U.P. School on 15.7.1992. Her appointment was approved and later she was retrenched from the school for want of vacancy during 1995-96 staff fixation. She was again appointed in a leave vacancy as UPSA (Science) from 12.9.1995 to 13.12.1995, from 6.1.1997 to 26.3.1997 and from 4.6.1997 to 1.9.1997. All the appointments were approved. Accordingly petitioner acquired a right under Rule 51A of Chapter XIV-A of the K.E.R. for future appoi


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top