SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Ker) 285

S.SANKARASUBBAN, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
Marimuthu – Appellant
Versus
Director General of Police – Respondent


Judgment :-

AR. Lakshmanan, Ag. C. J.

Heard Mr. M. Rajasekharan Nair for the petitioner, Mr. N. Nandakumara Menon for the 2nd respondent, Mr. Basant Balaji for the respondent and the Government Pleader for Respondents 1,5 and 6.

2. The Original Petition was field by the petitioners who are in possession of building No.T.C. 37/28 on a monthly rent of Rs. 1,000/- per month. The 4th respondent Sivasankaran Nair is the owner of the premises. The property was leased out to the first petitioner for the purpose of conducting textile business and it is so stated in the rent deed dated 1.7.1993 executed by the 4th respondent According to the petitioners, the 4th respondent is trying to take forcible possession of the building without recourse to the law and many attempts have been made by the 4th respondent and his children to take possession of the room in which the business is being conducted, which resulted in the filing of a suit, O.S. No. 282 of 1996, in which the Court at first granted interim order restraining the 4th respondent and others from dispossessing the petitioners from the shop room. The suit was later decreed on 31.3.1998. It is alleged by the petitioners that Inspite of the



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top