SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Ker) 494

Judges : D.SREEDEVI
Soumini - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala - Respondent
Case No : O.P. No.17964 of 1995
Decided On : 11/26/1999
Advocates Appeared :
V.K. Ravindran & C.T. Ravikumar For Petitioner Government Pleader (Subal Paul) & K.A. Abraham For Respondents

Headnote:

KeralaEducation Rules 1959 Chap.XIVA, Rule45 - Physical Education - Specialist Teachers - School - Headmaster - Hence dispute in case is in respect preferential right of petitioner to be promoted Headmaster of School - Petitioner has filed Original Petition for writ of certiorari quashing order of and declare that petitioner is duly entitled to be promoted as headmaster of school with effect and approval of respondent as Headmaster is void and to direct to approve appointment of petitioner as Headmaster -Held, Amended including specialist teachers also in seniority list - It is true that seniority list not in accordance with combined seniority list was prepared - In seniority list petitioner was shown as item and respondent was shown as item - Department ought not have included name of respondent seniority list - But petitioner has not challenged this seniority list so far - Petition dismissed.

Judgment :-

D. Sreedevi, J.

The petitioner is an Upper Primary School Assistant Teacher (UPS a) in Orkkatteri Noth Upper Primary School, Chombala in Vatakara Education District. The school is an aided school governed by the Kerala Education Act (in short 'the Act') and the Kerala Education Rules (the KER). As she had acquired the qualifications of B.A. and B .Ed., she was regularly appointed with approval as UPSA of the school. The petitioner acquired the obligatory test qualification mandated in R.45B(1) of Chapt XIV A of the KER for promotion to the post of Headmaster of the school under R.45 of Chapter XIVA of the KER. While she was working there, a vacancy of Headmaster arose on 1.6.1994. According to the petitioner, she is the rightful claimant for appointment as Headmaster. But the 5th respondent was appointed as the Headmaster. Hence the dispute in this case is in respect of the preferential right of the petitioner to be promoted as Headmaster of the School. The petitioner has filed this Original Petition for a writ of certiorari quashing Ext. P2 order of the A.E.O. and to declare that the petitioner is duly entitled to be promoted as headmaster of the school with effect from 1.6.94 and approval of the 5th respondent as Headmaster is void and to direct the A.E.O. to approve the appointment of the petitioner as Headmaster.

2. The 3rd respondent filed a counter affidavit contending that the Manager on arising a vacancy of Headmaster has promoted the 5th respondent as he was working as Physical Education teacher, with effect from 1.6.94 and the said appointment was duly approved. At the time of appointment as Headmaster, he was having B. A. and B.Ed, and pass in Account test (Lower). As per the combined seniority list of staff working in the school, the 5th respondent's rank No. is 8 and the petitioner's rank No. is 11. Originally, when he was appointed as Physical Education Teacher, he has only passed SSLC and obtained a certificate in Physical Education. Subsequently, he acquired B. A. Degree in 1978 and B.Ed. Degree in 1982. He has passed Account test (Lower) in 1988. The petitioner was appointed as U.P. School Assistant from 15.7.75 onwards with qualification of B. A. and B.Ed. She passed Account test (Lower) in

1991. 5th respondent also filed a counter supporting the contentions of the 3rd respondent.

3. Ext. P2 is the order issued by the Assistant Educational Officer dated 25.10.1995. In this order the A.E.O. has stated that the 5m respondent is the senior-most qualified teacher and he can be appointed as Headmaster with effect from 1.6.94 as per R.45A Chap. XIVA KER. The petitioner has challenged the validity of this order. R.45 Chapter XIVA KER reads as follows:

"45. Subject to R.44, when the post of Headmaster of complete U.P. School is vacant or when an incomplete U.P. School becomes a complete U.P. School, the post shall be filled up from among the qualified teachers on the staff of the School or Schools under the Educational Agency. If there is a Graduate teacher with B.Ed, or other equivalent qualification and who has got at least five years experience in teaching (after acquisition of B.Ed. Degree) he may be. appointed as Headmaster provided he has got a service equal to half of the period of service of the senior most under graduate teacher".

xxx

Note to R.45 provides as follows:

"Note.- The language/ specialist teachers, according to their seniority in the combined seniority list of teachers, shall also be appointed as Headmaster of U.P. Schools under an Educational Agency provided the teacher possesses the prescribed qualifications for promotion as Headmaster of U.P. School on the date of occurrence of vacancy".

The petitioner claims that she has preferential claims to be promoted as Headmaster in the vacancy occurred on 1.6.94 in accordance with the provisions of R.45 read with Rr. 34,43 and 44 of Chap. XIVA of KER. R.34(b) provides as follows:

"In the case of Upper Primary School and Lower Primary School a combin






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top