SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Ker) 527

J.B.KOSHY
Sulekha Clay Mines – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Judgment :-

J.B. Koshy, J.

The question to be decided in this case is the validity of R.2(c) of the Kerala Arbitration and Conciliation (Court) Rules, 1997 thereinafter referred to as 'the rules'). There was an arbitration appeal between the petitioner and the fifth respondent and an award was passed on 26.9.1998. Fifth respondent preferred an application under S.34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 thereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for setting aside the above award. Ext. P1 is the copy of the application which is pending before the District Court, Trivandrum. Petitioner filed objections to the above. While the above matter was pending an objection was filed by the fifth respondent in O.P. (Arbitration) No. 142/99 stating that the District Court has no jurisdiction to consider Ext. P1 application in view of R.2(c) of the Rules. R.2(c) of the Rules reads as follows:

"(c) 'Court' under S.2(e) of the Act for the purpose of deciding any question, excepting appointment of arbitrators under S.11 of the Act, shall be the Principal Sub Court having jurisdiction to decide the questions forming the subject-matter of the arbitration if the same had been the subject-matter of a






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top