SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Ker) 244

S.MARIMUTHU
Sibi – Appellant
Versus
Vilasini – Respondent


Judgment :-

This Crl. Revision Petition is directed challenging the confirmed judgment of the Sessions Judge, Thalassery delivered in Crl. A. No. 112 of 1996. The first revision petitioner was found guilty under section 417 read with 34, I.P.C. and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two months and also found guilty under section 312 read with 109, I.P.C. and thereby sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for four months. In addition to the above sentences, he was directed to pay a sum of Rs. 50,000/- as compensation to the victim lady, Vilasini, first respondent herein, under the provisions of Section 357(3), Cr.P.C. and in case of default in payment of the compensation, he shall undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year. The second accused-second petitioner who is the sister of the first petitioner-first accused was released under section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act. In the appeal, the Sessions Judge confirmed the conviction and sentence and also affirmed the payment of compensation of Rs. 50,000/- in toto.

2. While taking this revision on file, this Court suspended the sentence of the Sessions Judge and also stayed his finding as to the pa










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top