Judges : C.S.RAJAN
Sebastian P.Joseph - Appellant
Versus
K.S.R.T.C. - Respondent
Case No : O.P.No. 7714 of 1997
Decided On : 08/28/1998
Advocates Appeared :
M.R. Rajendran Nair & M.R. Sudheendran For Petitioner V. Bhaskara Menon & O.V. Radhakrishnan For Respondents
Ranked List - Appointment to Reserve Conductors in K.S.R.T.C. - R.13, R.14 of Public Service Commission Rules of Procedure - [R.13, R.14] - The court discussed the interpretation of R.13 and R.14 of the Rules and their combined effect on advising candidates for vacancies reported during the currency of the ranked list. The court referred to previous rulings and held that the vacancies must be reported during the period when the ranked list is kept alive for the Commission to advise candidates.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners were included in the ranked list for appointment to the post of Reserve Conductors in the K.S.R.T.C. and sought a declaration that all vacancies arising during the validity period of the ranked list should be filled from that list.
Finding of the Court:
The court analyzed the interpretation of R.13 and R.14 of the Rules and referred to previous rulings. It concluded that vacancies must be reported during the period when the ranked list is kept alive for the Commission to advise candidates. As a result, the Original Petition was dismissed.
Issues: Interpretation of R.13 and R.14 of the Public Service Commission Rules of Procedure, Validity of ranked list for advising candidates for vacancies reported after the period of validity
Ratio Decidendi: The vacancies must be reported during the period when the ranked list is kept alive for the Commission to advise candidates.
Final Decision: The Original Petition was dismissed.
C.S. Rajan, J.
The petitioners were included in the ranked list prepared by the P.S.C. for appointment to the post of Reserve Conductors in the K.S.R.T.C., which was brought into force with effect from 18.5.1992. The prayer in the Original Petition is to declare that all the vacancies of Reserve Conductors in the K.S.R.T.C. which arose during the validity period of the ranked list are liable to be filled up from that list, even if those vacancies are reported after the period of validity of the list. I would have disposed of this Original Petition without much difficulty following the Full Bench decision reported in Vintala Kumari v. State (1994(2) KLT 47). But Sri. M.R. Rajendran Nair, learned counsel for the petitioners made a fervent plea that the above Full Bench decision did not take into consideration R.14 of the Public Service Commission Rules of Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the rules), According to the learned counsel the above decision relied only on R.13 of the Rules. Therefore, I am constrained to deal with the question whether it makes any difference if R.14 is also considered in order to decide this question. R.13 of the Rules reads as follows:
"13. The ranked lists published by the Commission shall remain in force for a period of one year from the date on which it was brought into force provided that the said list will continue to be in force till the publication of a new list after the expiry of the minimum period of one year or till the expiry of three years whichever is earlier." (provisos omitted) R.14 is also re-produced for easy reference:
"14. The Commission shall advise candidates for all the vacancies reported and pending before them for the period during which the ranked lists are kept alive in the order of seniority, if any and in the order of merit subject to the rules of reservation and rotation, wherever they are applicable."
The Full Bench ruling (Vimalakunuiri 's case) arose out of a review petition filed by the petitioners therein. The petitioners therein were included in the ranked list of candidates selected for appointment as Sales Tax Officers. The above ranked list was brought into effect from 31.10.1984. Originally this Court directed the Government to report 7 vacancies to the P.S.C. for advice. There are 4 more vacancies which remained to be reported as per the order of the learned single Judge. This court held that the question of directing the P.S.C. to advise the petitioners did not arise because the ranked list expired. In the Review petition it was argued that the observation that the rank list having expired, the question of directing the PSC to advise the petitioners does not arise is not the correct position of law. It was further contended that notwithstanding the expiry of the ranked list, this Court was entitled to command the Government to compel the P.S.C. to advise the names of the petitioners as there were vacancies available. Finally, after an elaborate discussion with a number of rulings of this Court on the point, the Full Bench held that if not request was made by the State to-the P.S.C. for advising candidates during the currency of a list, the Court could not compel the P.S.C. to advise the candidates after the expiry of the list.
2. Now I will consider whether R.14 of the Rules would make any difference with regard to the above proposition. According to R.14 of the Rules the Commission shall advise candidates for all the vacancies reported and pending before them for the period during which the ranked lists are kept alive in the order of seniority, if any, and in the order of merit subject to the rules of reservation and rotation, wherever they are applicable. What is the period of life of a ranked list has been prescribed in R.13. Therefore, it is only on a combined reading of Rr.13 and 14 it could be held that the Commission can advise candidates for all the vacancies reported during the currency of She list. It is quite clear that the vacancies mus
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.