SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Ker) 274

A.R.LAKSHMANAN, D.SREEDEVI
Indian Bank – Appellant
Versus
Jayasree – Respondent


Judgment :-

A.R. Lakshmanan, J.

Heard Mr. E. Subramani, learned counsel for the appellants, Mr. an and, learned counsel for the second respondent and Mr. Grashious Kuriakose, learned counsel for the impleaded party.

2. The writ appeal is directed against the judgment in O.P. No. 6138 of 1997, dated 11th November, 1997. The second respondent by a notification dated 28.6.1995 invited applications among others for the post of Clerk-cum-Cashier, Typist-cum-Clerk (English) and Stenographer (English) from among eligible candidates in respect of vacancies likely to arise during the year 1995-96 in the Public Sector Banks in the State of Kerala, Mahe and Union Territories of Lakshadweep. 1st respondent, Jayasree, was one of the applicants. According to her, after a process of selection, which included a written test, a skilled test and an interview, she was included in Ext. P1 select list prepared by the 2nd respondent - the Banking Service Recruitment Board. According to the 1st respondent, she was included in the wait list for the post of Clerk-cum-Cashier with rank No. 15 in the general category and as serial No. 9 in the general category for the post of Typist-cum-Clerk (English). It is












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top