P.A.MOHAMMAD, G.SIVARAJAN
Raghavan – Appellant
Versus
Raju – Respondent
P.A.Mohammed, J.
The tenant in a rent control petition for eviction is the revision petitioner. The revision is directed against the judgment of the Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur passed under S.20 of the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965 (for short 'the Act'). The respondent-landlord filed the application seeking to evict the petitioner-tenant from the petitioner schedule building under S.11(2)(b) and S.11(3) of the Act. The Rent Control Court has refused eviction on the ground of arrears of rent and thus, disallowed eviction under S.11(2)(b). However, the eviction was ordered on the ground of bonafide requirement under S.11(3) of the Act. As against the order of the Rent Control Court the tenant filed appeal under S.18 of the Act before the Rent Control Appellate Authority. The order of the Rent Control Court under S.11(2)(b) has become final. Therefore, the substantial ground available for eviction before the Appellate Authority was under S.11(3). The Appellate Authority, after evaluating the evidence, agreed with the order of eviction passed by the Rent Control Court under S.11(3). Hence the present revision petition has been filed by the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.