SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Ker) 9

K.A.ABDUL GAFOOR
Satyapalan – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director of Education – Respondent


Judgment :-

K.A. Abdul Gafoor, J.

Both the petitioners in this case had temporary service under R.9(a)(i) on advice through Employment Exchange, as High School Assistants. Their services were terminated on the expiry of their provisional appointments. Later, both of them were recruited through Public Service Commission as Primary Departmental Teachers, a post lower than to that of High School Assistant (H.S.A.) on 28.1.77 and 21.2.1977 respectively. They continued in the post as per orders In force. They were promoted on regular basis as H.S. As. as per Exts. P1 and P2 dated 23.9.77 and 7.1.78 respectively. Thus, they became H.S. As. Taking the temporary service that they had put in even much prior to the regular appointment in the lower post of Primary Departmental Teacher, the increment due to the petitioners in the promoted post of H.S.A. was sanctioned. Later the error in reckoning the temporary service as H.S.A. which the petitioners had put in before their entry in service in the lower category of P.D. teacher on regular basis, for the purpose of granting increment after promotion as H.S. As from the lower post was detected and Exts. P3 and P4 were issued directing refixation










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top