SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Ker) 42

K.A.MOHAMMED SHAFI
Michael Kuruvilla – Appellant
Versus
Joseph J. Kondody – Respondent


Judgment :-

K.A. Mohammed Shafi J.

The complainant in C.C. No. 40 of 1993 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Changanacherry, is the appellant.

2. He filed the complaint against the respondent alleging the offence punishable under S.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', on the ground that the respondent-accused issued a cheque for Rs. 3,000/- to discharge his previous liability and on presentation of the cheque for collection, it was bounced and he did not pay the amount inspite of the registered notice sent to him through an. Advocate calling upon him to pay the amount.

3. The lower court, after trial, found the respondent not guilty of the offence punishable under S.138 of the Act, acquitted him and set him at liberty by judgment dated 27.1.1994. Hence, the complainant has come up in appeal before this Court.

4. The lower court rightly rejected the contention of the respondent that there was no proper notice as contemplated under proviso (b) to S.138 of the Act. That contention of the respondent was based on the fact that he was known as Joseph J. Kondody, whereas the registered notice was sent to Jose J. Kondody. Even th














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top