SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Ker) 99

A.R.LAKSHMANAN
Vijayamma – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

A.R. Lakshmanan, J.

The above Writ Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings under Exts. P3, P4 and the order of the second respondent approving the appointment of the 5th respondent as Headmaster and for a direction directing the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the claim of the petitioner for seniority over respondent 5 and for appointment as Headmaster. The petitioner was working as High School Assistant in Mahatma High School for Girls under the management of the 3rd respondent. According to the petitioner she was fully qualified and was having training qualification with effect from 18.6.1962. When the petitioner made a representation before the 3rd respondent District Educational Officer on 30.6.1989 requesting to appoint the petitioner to the post' of Headmaster cancelling the appointment of the 5th respondent, the representation was not properly responded to. The petitioner came to know that the third respondent approved the appointment of the 5th respondent by order No. D.D is. 4696/89 dated 27.5.1989 as Headmaster during the last week of June, 1989. Thereupon, the petitioner filed an appeal on 4.8.1989 before the second respondent Deputy Director of Educat
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top