S. Sankarasubban, J..

Both these Civil Revision Petitions arise from a common order and hence they are being disposed of together. C.R.P. No. 579 of 1997 is filed against the order in E.A. No. 181/96 in E.P. No. 160/91 in O.S. No. 91/81 of the Sub Court, Thalassery while C.R.P. No. 898/97 is filed against the order in E. A. No. 180/96 in the same proceedings. C.R.P. No. 579/97

2. First respondent Bank is the decree holder. The suit was filed against respondents 2 and 3 for recovery of amount on the basis of mortgage. In this Civil Revision Petition, we are concerned with one item of property. That item is decree schedule item 3. Decree schedule item 3 belongs to the second defendant. Item 3 described in the decree as follows:

"Item No. 3:-District Sub-District Taluk

Amsoin Desom Survey Re-Survey Extent

sq. metres)

Cannanore

- Tellicherry

Tellicherry

Thiruvangad

- Vayalalani

- 4/4A3

- 8/1 '

- 2 Acres 65 cents (i hector 07 areas 24

Description: -Jamayil ParachaKandathitte Vadakke Chirayum KelUnnuThazheKayippadu EnnaPerayaparappillottaKaiicfcunNilavimiNila]hihiinnuKihdiuyarUiiUndiikkiyaNadakallum, Nadakkal,Qiirakkal,HliukalilKizhikoorukalum, Velu'kanani Muthalaya Sarvathum.

Thack-1. Boun