SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Ker) 98

Judges : K.K.USHA,K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,S.SANKARASUBBAN
Dayalan Rajes - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala - Respondent
Case No : T.R.C.Nos.88&87 of 1993
Decided On : 03/11/1998
Advocates Appeared :
N.N. Vekitachalam For Petitioner V.V. Asokan (Spl. G.P. Taxes) For Respondents

The applicability of the Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1975 is determined by the domicile of the Hindu joint family, and the Act applies only to Hindus in the State of Kerala, abolishing the joint family system among Hindus in Kerala and replacing joint tenancy with tenancy-in-common.

Headnote:

Tax Revision Cases - Interpretation of Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1975 - S.1, S.2, S.3, S.4, S.5, S.7 - The court held that the Act applies only to Hindus in the State of Kerala and has no impact on a Hindu joint family outside the State of Kerala. The Act abolishes the joint family system among Hindus in Kerala and replaces joint tenancy with tenancy-in-common. The Act also abrogates the rule of pious obligation of Hindu son and ceases to have effect with respect to any matter for which provision is made in the Act. The court emphasized that the law applicable to a Hindu Joint Family depends on its domicile and the Act's scope is not limited to the apportionment of property alone, but also deals with other obligations and liabilities of the members of the joint Hindu family.

Fact of the Case:

The assessee, domiciled in Tamil Nadu, was assessed to Kerala Agricultural Income Tax for the years 1978-79 and 1979-80. The assessing authority granted the status of tenants-in-common to the assessee, his wife, and daughter based on the disruption of the Hindu Joint Family due to the Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1975. The Deputy Commissioner set aside the assessment orders, and the Commissioner upheld the view that the Act has no application to the assessee's family.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the Act applies only to Hindus in the State of Kerala and has no impact on a Hindu joint family outside the State of Kerala. The Commissioner's decision to reject the revisions filed by the assessee and direct the Agrl. Income Tax Officer to issue fresh assessment orders in accordance with law was upheld.

Issues: Interpretation of the applicability of the Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1975 to a Hindu joint family domiciled outside the State of Kerala and the bar of limitation for initiating suo motu proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi: The law applicable to a Hindu Joint Family depends on its domicile. The Act applies only to Hindus in the State of Kerala and abolishes the joint family system among Hindus in Kerala, replacing joint tenancy with tenancy-in-common. The Act also abrogates the rule of pious obligation of Hindu son and ceases to have effect with respect to any matter for which provision is made in the Act.

Final Decision: The Tax Revision Cases were dismissed, and the court held that the Act has no application to the assessee who is domiciled outside Kerala. The court also held that there is no bar of limitation for initiating suo motu proceedings.

Judgment :-

K.K. Usha, J.

These Tax Revision cases came up for consideration of the Full Bench along with O.P. Nos. 9468 & 10950/92 and 1893/93 and certain other Tax Revision Cases. Eventhough the questions raised in the Writ Petitions and Revision Cases mentioned above are not exactly the same which are arising in these cases, we heard all the cases together since the interpretation of the provisions of the Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1975 arises in all these cases.

1A, These Tax Revision cases, at the instance of the assessee, arise out of a common order passed by the Commissioner of Agrl. Income tax, Thiruvananthapuram in AITRP.17& 18/93tx dated 5.4.1993. Relevant assessment years are 1978-79 and 1979-80. The questions of law raised for decision of this Court are as follows;

"(i) Whether the property of the assessee situate in Kerala State who is governed by the Hindu Mitakshara law will not come under the purview of the Kerala Joint Hindu Family (Abolition) Act on the ground that the assessee is residing outside Kerala State?

(ii) Whether the Kerala Joint Hindu Family (Abolition) Act, 1975 is applicable to the assessee?

(iii) Whether domicile of a person governs the system of law relating to property situate in Kerala State?

(iv) Whether there is bar of limitation for initiating suo mote proceedings?

(v) Has not the order passed by the Sub Court, Salem in I.A.1372/80 in O.S.No. 366/80 allotted shares to the wife and daughter of Dayalan Rajes the assessee?"

2. The assessee who is domiciled in Tamil Nadu is having properties in Kerala. He was originally assessed to Kerala Agricultural Income Tax on 1.7.1988 for the assessment years 1978-79 and 1979-80. Assessee obtained the property under family partition deeds dated 14.7.1954 and 16.10.1956. Assessing Authority took the view that for the year 1978-79, the assessee has to be granted the status of tenants-in-common with his wife and one daughter. This view was taken by the assessing authority on the basis that the Hindu Joint Family consisting of the assessee, his wife and daughter has got disrupted on the Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1975 coming into force on 1.12,1976. Similar view was taken in respect of the assessment for the year 1979-80 also. Deputy Commissioner, Agrl. Income-tax and Sales-tax, Palghat, in exercise of his power of suo mote revision under S.75 of the Kerala Agricultural Income tax Act, 1991, issued notice on 6.11.1991 calling for objections. The Deputy Commissioner prima facie found that the assessment as tenants-in-common in the case of the assessee was irregular since the Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1975 has no application to the family of the assessee in Tamil Nadu. Assessee filed his objections on 20.12.1991. He was granted a personal hearing also. He put forward a contention that pursuant to a compromise decree in O.S.366/80 before the Subordinate Judge, Salem filed by the petitioner's wife and daughters for maintenance, education and marriage expenses, a settlement was arrived at between himself, his wife and two daughters and one son on 20.9.1981. He contended that there is no infirmity in the assessment orders assigning status of tenants-in-common to the assessee, his wife and daughter. The Deputy Commissioner rejected the case put forward by the assessee and came to the conclusion that the Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1975 has no application to the case of the assessee. Assessment orders for the years 1978-79 and 1979-80 were set aside and the cases were remanded back to the Agrl. Income Tax Officer, Chittur for fresh disposal after proper verification in accordance with law.

3. Aggrieved by the order passed by the Dy. Commissioner, assessee filed revision petitions before the Commissioner of Agrl. Income Tax. Before the Commissioner, it was contended by the assessee that the Kerala Joint Hindu Family system (Abolition) Act, 1975 is applicable to the assessee that even





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top