SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Ker) 558

A.R.LAKSHMANAN, K.NARAYANA KURUP
State of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
Sugathakumar – Respondent


Judgment :-

AR. Lakshmanan, J.

Heard Mr. Alexander Thomas, Government Pleader for appellants and Mr. P. Kesavan Nair for respondent.

2. This appeal is by the State of Kerala challenging the judgment in O.P. 10208/ 97 of a learned Single judge of this Court. The Writ Appeal was argued by both counsel appearing on either side at length. The respondent/ petitioner in the O.P. filed the writ petition to quash Exts. P10, P16 and P17. Ext. P10 is the proceedings of the Government of Kerala, Vigilance Department dated 16.9.1996 placing the respondent under suspension pending disciplinary action against him when the respondent was acting as a Director of ANERT. Ext. P16 is the order passed by the Government of Kerala dated 16.6.1997 reinstating the respondent in service without prejudice to the disciplinary action pending against him and in public interest. The respondent was also reverted to his parent department viz., Technical Education Department in public interest and the Director of Technical Education Department was directed to arrange for suitable posting to the respondent herein. Ext. P17 is against an order passed by the Government of Kerala dated 27.6.1997 expressing its decision



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top