SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Ker) 310

S.KRISHNAN UNNI
State of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
Umesh Rao – Respondent


Judgment :-

S. Krishnan Unni, J.

This is a petition filed under Ss.149 and 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure and S.5 of the Limitation Act. to condone the delay of 83 days in remitting 2/3rd balance court fee payable in the appeal after it was admitted. It is stated that the delay was caused due to administrative reasons beyond the control of the appellant. State is the appellant. The appeal is filed challenging the judgment in L.A.R. No. 2 of 1994 of Sub Court. Hosdurg.

2. The claimant who is the respondent in the appeal opposes the petition in that there are no valid reasons for condoning the delay and administrative reasons are hardly relevant in the matter of paying the balance court fee. It is also contended that S.52 of the Kerala Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act. 1959 (for short 'the Act') provides for time for payment upto 30 days and therefore the delay of 83 days should not be condoned.

3. There are similar petitions. very many in number. wherein after admission of appeals parties have not paid the 2/3rd balance court fee as provided in S.52 of the Act. Therefore. all the petitions were posted for common hearing and counsel were heard. The question involved is the operati
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top