SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Ker) 116

K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, B.N.PATNAIK
Abdul Jaleel – Appellant
Versus
Sahida – Respondent


Judgment :-

Balakrishnan, J.

The respondent in O.P. No. 343/96 on the file of the Family Court, Ernakulam is the appellant. The respondent herein filed a petition before the Family Court for a declaration of her right over one item of immovable property and also for partition and separate possession of a share in another item of immovable property. The respondent alleged that her marriage with the appellant was on 3.1.1988 and two children were born in the wed lock. The respondent alleged that the appellant acquired 9 cents of land mentioned as 'A' Schedule in the petition in his name with the funds provided by the respondent. The respondent also contended that' B' Schedule property was purchased by the appellant with the funds raised by him by selling the gold ornaments of the respondent. The appellant is working in a Gulf country. It is admitted that the appellant divorced the respondent on 1.11.1995 in accordance with the Muslim rites.

2. The appellant filed a counter statement before the Family Court denying the allegations contained in the petition. He had also raised a contention that at the time of filing of the petition by the respondent, she was no longer the wife of the app















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top