SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Ker) 151

J.B.KOSHY
Joseph – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Judgment :-

J.B. Koshy, J.

Petitioners in this case are Partners of two Partnership concerns, namely, K.A. Joseph and sons and Jose & Sons. Petitioners 1 to 9 are partners of the partnership firm K.A. Joseph and sons and in Jose & Sons there are only four partners, petitioners 6,7,2 & 4 respectively. It is averred that these two firms are registered under the Kerala Money Lenders Act and they are having necessary licences for money lending business. It is stated that petitioners 10 and 11 are not partners Of either 'Of I hi "'concerns. Petitioners, in the course of business, did not refund the amount due to the customers and the customers approached the .Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Trissur constituted under the Consumer Protection Act,1986 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act). Respondents 5 to 43 have filed various claims before the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum and all the petition were allowed. Copies of all orders were not produced in the original petition. Ext. P3 is the copy of order passed in O.P. No. 853/94 by the 2nd respondent. It can be seen from Ext. P3 order that respondents in that case (Petitioners 1, 4, 8 & 9 in the original petition) did not appear before
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top