Judges : K.G.BALAKRISHNAN,P.K.BALASUBRAMANYAN,J.B.KOSHY
Peoples Council for Social Justice - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala - Respondent
Case No : O.P. Nos. 3040 of 1988,12343 of 1991 & 7827 of 1994
Decided On : 07/28/1997
Advocates Appeared :
M.P.R. Nair For Petitioner Advocate General (M.K. Damodaran), K.P. Dandapani, Thampan Thomas, Kurian Joseph, Deepak T. Nedungadan, N. James Koshy, K.R. Kurup, U.K. Ramakrishnan & P.G.P. Panicker For Respondents
Demonstrations - Public Order - Kerala Police Act, S.19, Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, S.3 - The court considered the issue of public demonstrations and processions causing obstruction to vehicular and pedestrian traffic. It discussed the fundamental rights of freedom of speech and expression, the right to assemble peaceably, and the duty of the police to regulate public assemblies and processions. The court highlighted the need for restrictions and limits to processions and demonstrations in public places to protect the fundamental rights of pedestrians under Art.19 & 21 of the Constitution.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus to ensure that demonstrations and processions within the Cochin Corporation area are conducted without obstructing the free movement of pedestrians and vehicular traffic. They alleged that the blocking of roads and stopping the movement of pedestrians and vehicles violated the rights of the public.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that while freedom of association and assembly are linked with human rights, these rights should be exercised without causing injury or annoyance to others. It acknowledged the need to balance the rights of participants in demonstrations and processions with the rights of ordinary citizens to use public roads.
Issues: The issues involved the obstruction of vehicular and pedestrian traffic by demonstrations and processions, the duty of the police to prevent such obstruction, and the need for regulations and restrictions to protect the rights of pedestrians and vehicular traffic.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the organizers of processions or demonstrations must give advance notice to the highest Police Officer of the District, and the police should regulate the procession to ensure it does not obstruct the passing and re-passing of pedestrians or vehicles. It also emphasized the duty of the police to prevent obstruction and enforce the provisions of the Police Act.
Final Decision: The court issued specific directions to regulate processions and demonstrations, including advance notice requirements, restrictions on the occupation of roads, assistance for pedestrians at road junctions, prohibition of disorderly conduct and weapons, and the enforcement of the Police Act. It disposed of the Original Petitions with these directions.
K.G. Balakrishnan, J.
These three Original Petitions have been filed seeking a writ of mandamus or other appropriate order directing the respondents to ensure that all demonstrations or processions of any form within the Cochin Corporation area are conducted without obstructing in any way the free movement of pedestrians and vehicular traffic. O.P. No. 12343 of 1991 is filed by a public spirited citizen. In O.P. No. 3040 of 1988 and O.P. No. 7827 of 1994 are filed by a registered Societies. When these matters came before the learned singe judge it was felt that the question of law involved in these Original Petitions are of general importance and these cases were referred to a Bench.
2. We heard counsel for the petitioners, learned Advocate General and some of the counsel for respondents.
3. Petitioners allege that though Ernakulam city is commercially very important, the roads, such as, Banerji Road, M.G. Road, Shanmugham Road and Chittoor Road are not very much wide and except M.G. Road, all other roads are not sufficient to accommodate the ever increasing vehicular traffic. These roads are maintained by the Cochin Corporation. Various institutions like Courts, Hospitals, Colleges and Schools, Banks and other establishments are located within a small area and they are accessible only through the roads mentioned above. The bus services, boat service, railway and airport etc can be approached only through the main roads of the Cochin city. If any of these important roads is blocked the entire flow of traffic will be paralyzed.
4. One of the important problems faced by the general public is that these roads are often blocked by the authorities to facilitate the political parties or other organisations to take out processions or demonstrations through public streets. Whenever procession or demonstration passes through any of these roads the entire vehicular traffic is blocked. This causes undue hardship to the public. Sometimes processionists stage 'dharna' in front of the State Government offices and Central Government Offices. Even if there are very few persons in the procession its participants block the roads completely and prevent vehicular traffic and most often they do not allow the pedestrians to cross the roads. According to the petitioners, the blocking of roads and completely stopping the movements of the pedestrians and vehicles are serious violations of the rights of the public. Those who want urgent medical attention or to attend public examination or interviews or to reach Airport to catch the flight find it extremely difficult and the participants of demonstration and procession prevent these persons from going to their destination and the authorities are not doing anything to avoid the hardships of the public. Though the political parties and religious congregations have a right to assemble peacefully and move through these roads they have no right to create unreasonable obstruction which may cause inconvenience to others.
Petitioners allege that under S.149 of the Criminal Procedure Code and S.19 of the Police Act it is the duty of the police to prevent the commission of any public nuisance. The police have a duty to prevent the. obstruction on the road. Therefore, the petitioners pray that there shall be a writ of mandamus or other appropriate direction directing the authorities to ensure that all demonstrations and processions of any form within the Cochin Corporation area is conducted without obstructing in any way the free movement of pedestrians and vehicular traffic.
5. A counter-affidavit is filed by first respondent in O.P. 12343 of 1991. It is conceded that the demonstrations and processions result in traffic blockade and it causes inconvenience to the public, but it is contended that there is no inaction on the part of the authorities & in preventing such demonstration and processions. It is submitted that the police are helpless in preventing such things, eventhough they are taking all possible
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.