SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Ker) 242

K.A.ABDUL GAFOOR
Sayed Ahamedkoya Thangal – Appellant
Versus
Administrator, Union Territory of Lakshadweep – Respondent


Judgment :-

K.A. Abdul Gafoor, J.

Challenge in this Original Petition is against Ext. P4, a notice issued by the Sub Divisional Officer, the 2nd respondent. The petitioner seeks a direction not to give effect to Ext. P4 notice.

2. By Ext. P4, the 2nd respondent has invited application from interested persons for appointment of 'Kazis for Juma Masjid at Andrott in the vacancy caused due to the death of the then existing 'Kazi' namely one Pattakal Pookkoya Thangal. Ext. P4 shows that appointment is intended in terms of the Kazis Act, 1880, and that such notice was issued upon instruction from the Administrator of the Union Territory of Lakshadweep. It is further stated that applications received will be considered on the basis of an interview by a Committee consisting of Scholars from the main land.

3. The petitioner submits that he is a member of Pattakal tharvadu to which the deceased' Kazi' belonged. He submits that the position of Kazi' is hereditary and only a member of the said family can function as a'Kazi'. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled to function in place of the deceased' Kazi' and therefore there is no reason to issue Ext. P4 notice.

4. It is contended that under S.2 o













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top