SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Ker) 329

K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
Joseph – Appellant
Versus
K. S. R. T. C. – Respondent


Judgment :-

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.

Question that has come up for consideration in all these cases is as to whether the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation has got power to withhold Death-cum-Retirement Gratuity amount so as to meet the liability of the employees or pensioners pertaining to the awards passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunals.

2. Motor Accident Claims Tribunals are awarding large amounts by way of compensation against the Corporation and their drivers, in respect of the accidents occurred due to rash and negligent driving of drivers of the Corporation. Several awards are being passed making the Corporation as well as the drivers jointly and severally liable to compensate the victims. In some awards drivers are directly made liable to pay the compensation and the Corporation vicariously. In many of the awards-, there are clear findings to the effect that drivers are rash and negligent which led to the claim being allowed, and even then the Corporation was constrained to satisfy those awards causing considerable financial strain.

3. In fact, the loss caused to the Corporation due to rash and negligent driving of their drivers came up for serious comments by a Div


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top